Latest Blogs
| Barney Lamm and the Great Polar Bear Hunt |
| Thursday, April 01, 2010 by Ed Zaruk |
Dead in the winter of 1957, Northwestern Ontario camp owners, Barney Lamm and Dr. Clifford Eisentrout, took off from Kenora, Ontario for Alaska.  Overloaded with survival gear and an extra 47 US gallons of gas in a belly tank, they flew non-stop to Edmonton where the plane, a 150 Super Cub, was immediately grounded by the DOT.
  Barney's mechanics at Ontario Central Airlines had installed unauthorized pods on CF-JFO made from agricultural tanks in the wing struts for baggage storage.  Four days later they took off, the plane having been re-certified as experimental, their destination, Point Barrow.  (Only Barney could have pulled something like this off.) 
Snubbed by professional guides at Point Barrow who charged $10,000 for a hunt, the pair struck out on their own for the Arctic Ocean.  Landing at Kotzebue, a village of 350, on the Chukchi Sea, they secured lodging and next day set out on the hunt.   
''Worst part of flying over the ice was trying to land," said Barney, ''the ice was constantly changing and we'd be anywhere from 75 to 125 miles out from land." Temperature was 30 to 40 below (F) with constant winds."  Three days they flew before spotting their first sizable polar bear.  Barney took the opportunity to fly over Russia a bit, just to say he'd done it.  Pack ice is constantly shifting as sea and wind push it into a jumble of pressure ridges.  Herding the bear toward an area of flat ice where they could land was old hat as they'd done it many times with wolves back in Ontario.  Barney no sooner had the plane down than Doc was out and after the bear in the ridges.  It took two shots to bring the 900 pound beast down. 
Bad weather held them up for three days before they found Barney's bear in the pressure ridges.  This time it took some skilful flying, to herd the bear for several miles toward a narrow band of flat ice.  ''This is the most treacherous part of all,&rdquo Doc Eisentrout said.  ''There's no way to test the ice until you land on it."
Again both men left the airplane to hunt down their quarry.  Barney was using a .35 calibre automatic rifle.  After two shots, the gun jammed.  The wounded bear turned and charged.  Hammering furiously on the breech, Barney managed to clear it just in time to drop the 1200 pound animal.
The Alaska guides began talking to them again after their success, but they were to find out how reckless they'd been.  The flat ice they'd landed on was last night's new ice which had not yet broken up on the relentless currents.  The Alaskan pros always flew with two planes as it was not unheard of for one to break through the ice.  They also never left the airplane without a rubber inflatable.  Flat ice was known to break away, leaving stranded hunters watching their airplane drift away on another ice flow.
To fill out their month long hunt, Doc Eisentrout, who was also an American, made application to the US Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service for a wolf permit.  Issued on February 27, 1957, permit # A-FAI-57-9 allowed the two men to hunt wolves from the air as long as the, ''permittee shall be accompanied on all hunting flights by, Barney Lamm." 
Hunting along the north slope of the Brooks Range, the pair of ardent hunters managed to bring down 30 wolves with a $50 bounty on each, and the hides sold for $30 a piece.  Nice way to pay for their trip.  Not that expenses weren't high.  If you listen to an interview they gave to radio station CJRL in Kenora, there are some surprising cost for hamburgers, even by today's prices.
 Barney and Doc's interview
     (Remember, this is radio that is over 50 years old)
 (I'd recommend opening or printing the PDF file so you can follow the four and a half minute interview) 
Click here for a transcript of the interview
 With only enough room for Doc's pelt, Barney's, which weighed over 160 pounds, had to be shipped back home.  By April 11th Barney was at the Northwest Sportsmen's show in the Auditorium at Minneapolis, Wisconsin, promoting Ball Lake Lodge.  After an 18,000 mile journey with no radio, flying over barren ice and snow, often in whiteout conditions, it must have seemed pretty tame. 
 
 COMMENTS
        Post a comment here   or  author@EdZaruk.com
| Barney's Ball Lake Lodge |
| Tuesday, December 29, 2009 by Ed Zaruk |
 Barney and Marion Lamm flew into Canada in June of 1946 on a flight that would see them eventually build and operate the most prestigious fly-in fishing lodge in Northwestern Ontario. Barney's Ball Lake Lodge became the destination for America's elite, from movie stars to Mafia bosses, and all manner of politicians and businessmen in between.

Situated on Ball Lake, some 50 miles north of Kenora, Ontario, it was accessible only by air. In 1952 Barney bought out Gordie Hollinsworth, one of the principles of Ontario Central Airlines. Soon a fleet of yellow Norseman aircraft were ferrying guests and supplies not only to Ball Lake but also to many of the other fly-in lodges that were springing up throughout the English River system. Later he would add two Grumman Gooses and a Canso to the fleet to bring guest directly from the States to Ball Lake.
 
Tiffany lamps and brand new Evinrude outboard engines set the standard both Marion and Barney wanted for their guests. A well stocked bar in the main lodge served drinks that could be enjoyed in front of a huge stone fireplace after a day's fishing. Guides from the local Indian reservations made sure their clients never came home empty handed. At night, all the boats would

be pulled up on shore and lined up to make a picture perfect row along the beach. One of Barney's rules was that if a guest got his guide drunk, then he was assigned to him the next day. For all the booze the lodge went through, air plane loads of it, there were very few problems.
 
It was not uncommon to see the dock filled with airplanes and some pulled up on the beach overnight to be at Barney's beck and call the next morning in setting out his guests at small fishing lakes throughout the district. Ball Lake Lodge offered all the comforts of the big city, without the ever-growing hassle. Electric power and flush toilets were in each cabin. When a new guest arrived, a bottle of Crown Royal was placed in each room. Before this, Marion would often walk through after the cleaning girls and rub a finger along the mantle or shelves to check for dust.
 
A guest had only to set his fishing gear outside the door before going to breakfast in the main dining room. He would find it in the boat, along with his guide at the start of the day's fishing. Trophy fish were sent to the taxidermist and any fish the guest wanted to keep were filleted and packed in dry ice before being flown to

Kenora and sent on by express to their destinations across the continent.
 
Barney helped others get started in the tourist industry and was responsible for much of the publicity that gave Kenora, Ontario the reputation of being a fisherman's paradise. As a result, the Second Street dock on Kenora's water front became one of the busiest float planes bases in Canada.
  
 
 
 
COMMENTS:
 
From- Robyn Black
     Jan 24, 2010
 
Was thrilled to find your blog on Barney's. My dad went up every year for as long as I can remember in the 50's and 60's with the Elmer's Fishing Club from Kansas City, MO. Have been going through postcards and ran across all sorts of them (some great picture postcards!) from his annual fishing trips there. Most are dated between 1958 and 1961.
 
 
From- Barney Bruns
     Jan 19, 2010
 
My family knew Barney Lamm and worked at Ball Lake in the late 60's. I remember flying in the great &ampampampquotThunderChicken" of Ontario Central Airlines. They were wonderful airplanes. Barney was a great guy and had many great employees!
 
 Post a comment HERE   or  author@EdZaruk.com 
| Active vs Passive verbs in sentence structure |
| Friday, December 11, 2009 by Ed Zaruk |
 
Perhaps the most common beginning writer's problem is telling rather than showing your reader the action. Show, Don't Tell, is one of the basic rules of writing. Telling arises from the use, or rather, over-use of the verbs associated with 'to be.' By using was, were, and so on, you place the action at some distance from your reader. This use of passive voice could be written:  
 
There was a knock on the door. She was surprised.
 
Let's make the noun active by using different verbs and one sentence a subordinate clause-
 
A knock pounded on the door, surprising her.
 
Now we'll use some different verbs-
 
A late night knock came from the door, catching her unprepared.
Jumping from her chair, she answered the light knock on the door.
This is the basic difference between a passive sentence and an active one. The first pacifies you, simply letting you know what happened. The second places you in the midst of the action. It is active all around you. 
 
If I find myself writing a sentence with a 'to be' verb, I'll try to rewrite it as an active sentence. It almost always sounds sharper and more interesting that way. By using verbs of action one can engage the reader and bring them into the scene. Now there are times when a change of pace is required. Using 'to be' verbs will slow things down and have a dampening effect on the action.
 
If you do nothing else other than changing 'was' and 'were' to action verbs in your writing, you would go far to showing and not telling.
| Bannock |
| Monday, November 30, 2009 by Ed Zaruk |
Bannock is also known as frybread or Indian bread. First Nations people generally prepare bannock with white or whole wheat flour, baking powder and water, which are combined and kneaded, then fried in rendered fat over an open fire.
 
Here is a recipe that came to me to make bannock. Thought I'd share it with you, and as you can see, there is lots of leeway.
- Flour
- Baking powder
- Water
- Salt
- Lard or fat
 
How much of each? Haven't a clue, but this is what I was told to shoot for:
- 3 cups of flour
- tbs of baking powder
- pinch of salt
- enough water to mix into dough
- lard - use lots, 1/4" in the bottom of a frying pan
 
Dump all the dry ingredients into a bowl. Mix and add water until dough forms.   Spread dough out, put in frying and place in fire. Can also be cooked in the oven. What temperature? No idea, but not too hot because it takes a while to cook through. 
 
Serve hot with butter.
 
A couple of variations- mix dough thicker and wrap around a willow branch then cook over an open flame. Good as dumplings in stew. Is it any wonder that this bread that originated in Scotland was so popular with Natives and backwoods people?   
Tags: Bannock, Native life
| Great Writers? |
| Monday, November 23, 2009 by Ed Zaruk |
I had occasion to be involved in a short story contest recently where readers could leave comments when voting for their favorite work. I noticed that more than one person used the phrase, 'Great writing.' Now I take exception to that. When writing is 'great,&rsquo how do you describe something better. In my opinion only a few writers have ever reached the 'great,&rsquo status: Homer, Shakespeare, Dickens, and others within their class.
 
Stephen King in his book, On Writing, wrote:
 
While it is impossible to make a competent writer out of a bad writer, and while it is equally impossible to make a great writer out of a good one, it is possible, with lots of hard work, dedication, and timely help, to make a good writer out of a merely competent one.
 
Most of us fall into the latter and are constantly trying to improve. By telling us we are 'Great,' it distorts the hard work, dedication, and timely help, by making us think we have reached the highest plateau and no longer need to improve. Honest comments and criticism can bring us to the level of very good writers, but reserve 'great&rsquo and 'excellent&rsquo for that rare occasion when no higher commendation is available.